"What Trump has proposed A) could only be done by the Congress B) would be invalidated by the courts because it’s based on religion – if based on place of origin, Congress could do it and the courts probably wouldn’t care," Judge Nap . Hear his interview with Jamie below:
Caller Chuck can't figure out why Jamie would oppose the no-fly/no-gun suggestion made by President Obama in his speech on terror. This call goes from different POV's to sheer lunacy. Jamie on how to handle a liberal-loony:
"(We have) Massive responsibilities. and yet we have been cutting defense, cutting intel, focusing on climate change... We are paying the price for almost decade of indifference about the real national security responsibilities of this government."
Were there any signs that said, "no guns?" Because they certainly didn't read them, and if they did they ignored them. Which is shocking to me, because leftists feel those signs are the ultimate form of safety.